Dating billion year old rocks
If that had happened, Darwin’s ideas would have been refuted and abandoned.
Instead, radioactive dating indicates that Earth is about 4.5 billion years old—plenty of time for evolution and natural selection to take place.[i] But as we show here, geologists do not use radioactivity to establish the age of certain rocks.
They instead use selected radioactivity results to confirm what they need to see.
This kind of data could have shown that the Earth is young.If these assumptions that underlie radiometric dating are not true, then the entire theory falls flat, like a chair without its four legs.The second fatal flaw clearly reveals that at least one of those assumptions must actually be wrong because radiometric dating . Helens, we watched rocks being formed in the 1980s, but when sent to a laboratory 10 years later for dating, the 10-year-old rocks returned ages of hundreds of thousands to millions of years. The most common methods of dating rocks are; fossils, magnetism, and isotope decay.The earliest animal fossils date to about 580 million years ago. In the same way, fossils throughout the last half billion years tell us the age of the rock that contains them. Any rocks that contain iron or other magnetic minerals align according to the magnetic orientation of the planet when they form.